Jump to content

Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Skip to top
Skip to bottom

This page provides a place to discuss new items for inclusion on In the news (ITN), a protected template on the Main Page (see past items in the ITN archives). Do not report errors in ITN items that are already on the Main Page here— discuss those at the relevant section of WP:ERRORS.

This candidates page is integrated with the daily pages of Portal:Current events. A light green header appears under each daily section – it includes transcluded Portal:Current events items for that day. You can discuss ITN candidates under the header.

Giorgio Armani in 2009
Giorgio Armani

Glossary

[edit]
  • Blurbs are one-sentence summaries of the news story.
    • Altblurbs, labelled alt1, alt2, etc., are alternative suggestions to cover the same story.
    • A target article, bolded in text, is the focus of the story. Each blurb must have at least one such article, but you may also link non-target articles.
  • Articles in the Ongoing line describe events getting continuous coverage.
  • The Recent deaths (RD) line includes any living thing whose death was recently announced. Consensus may decide to create a blurb for a recent death.

All articles linked in the ITN template must pass our standards of review. They should be up-to-date, demonstrate relevance via good sourcing and have at least an acceptable quality.

Nomination steps

[edit]
  • Make sure the item you want to nominate has an article that meets our minimum requirements and contains reliable coverage of a current event you want to create a blurb about. We will not post about events described in an article that fails our quality standards.
  • Find the correct section below for the date of the event (not the date nominated). Do not add sections for new dates manually – a bot does that for us each day at midnight (UTC).
  • Create a level 4 header with the article name (==== Your article here ====). Add (RD) or (Ongoing) if appropriate.
Then paste the {{ITN candidate}} template with its parameters and fill them in. The news source should be reliable, support your nomination and be in the article. Write your blurb in simple present tense. Below the template, briefly explain why we should post that event. After that, save your edit. Your nomination is ready!
  • You may add {{ITN note}} to the target article's talk page to let editors know about your nomination.

The better your article's quality, the better it covers the event and the wider its perceived significance (see WP:ITNSIGNIF for details), the better your chances of getting the blurb posted.

Purge this page to update the cache

Headers

[edit]
  • When the article is ready, updated and there is consensus to post, you can mark the item as (Ready). Remove that wording if you feel the article fails any of these necessary criteria.
  • Admins should always separately verify whether these criteria are met before posting blurbs marked (Ready). For more guidance, check WP:ITN/A.
    • If satisfied, change the header to (Posted).
    • Where there is no consensus, or the article's quality remains poor, change the header to (Closed) or (Not posted).
    • Sometimes, editors ask to retract an already-posted nomination because of a fundamental error or because consensus changed. If you feel the community supports this, remove the item and mark the item as (Pulled).

Voicing an opinion on an item

[edit]

Format your comment to contain "support" or "oppose", and include a rationale for your choice. In particular, address the notability of the event, the quality of the article, and whether it has been updated.

Please do...

[edit]
  1. Pick an older item to review near the bottom of this page, before the eligibility runs out and the item scrolls off the page and gets abandoned in the archive, unused and forgotten.
  2. Review an item even if it has already been reviewed by another user. You may be the first to spot a problem, or the first to confirm that an identified problem was fixed. Piling on the list of "support!" votes will help administrators see what is ready to be posted on the Main Page.
  3. Tell about problems in articles if you see them. Be bold and fix them yourself if you know how, or tell others if it's not possible.

Please do not...

[edit]
  1. Add simple "support!" or "oppose!" votes without including your reasons. Similarly, curt replies such as "who?", "meh", or "duh!" are not helpful. A vote without reasoning means little for us, please elaborate yourself.
  2. Oppose an item just because the event is only relating to a single country, or failing to relate to one. We post a lot of such content, so these comments are generally unproductive.
  3. Accuse other editors of supporting, opposing or nominating due to a personal bias (such as ethnocentrism). We at ITN do not handle conflicts of interest.
  4. Comment on a story without first reading the relevant article(s).
  5. Oppose a recurring item here because you disagree with the recurring items criteria. Discuss them here.
  6. Use ITN as a forum for your own political or personal beliefs. Such comments are irrelevant to the outcome and are potentially disruptive.

Suggesting updates

[edit]

There are two places where you can request corrections to posted items:

  • Anything that does not change the intent of the blurb (spelling, grammar, markup issues, updating death tolls etc.) should be discussed at WP:Errors.
  • Discuss major changes in the blurb's intent or very complex updates as part of the current ITNC nomination.

Archives

[edit]

Archives of posted stories: Wikipedia:In the news/Posted/Archives

Sections

[edit]

This page contains a section for each day and a sub-section for each nomination. To see the size and title of each section, please expand the following section size summary.


September 5

[edit]

Disasters and accidents


September 4

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

Health and environment

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections


Myanmar Civil war onto ongoing or Sudanese civil war off

[edit]
Article: Myanmar civil war (2021–present) (talk · history · tag)
Ongoing item nomination (Post)
Credits:

Nominator's comments: already outlined my Reasons why , so pls look through the arguments already made. That said I do think there is an bias in the ongoing events on how what conflict page is chosen. That imo requires a broader discussion to solve. There were several counter points that I found reinforced this view.

My proposal here is to either A) Add the Myanmar Civil War article or B) Remove the Sudanese one. If one goes with the @Masem standard it should be B). (See reasons why wikilink). But for simplicities sake I'm going to propose A) Add Myanmar Civil War to the ongoing page.

Here's my first post from that talk page: "Why is this not listed in the ongoing wars section? I've previously seen it flicker back and forth, added and removed, like an Yoyo. The conflict isn't as media sexy in English language media. However, if you check handy wiki articles like List of ongoing armed conflicts, you'll see the conflict goes pretty hot in comparison. I'm also the creator and maintainer of Operation 1111, and I can tell you there is constant combat. So far, I see more arguments for its adding than not. As you can observe from the conflict list linked above, it fills the definition of Uppsala Conflict Data Program criteria for an major conflict, not only this, as per the same article you can see that it was an deadlier (unfortunetly) conflict than the already mentioned (on the wiki mainp age) Sudanese Civil War for the year 2024. The area where the conflict falls behind is in popular english language media coverage, like your fox news, cnn, bbc etc. Probably bc said nation states have fewer interests invested there, thus ppl in these countries also care less. If my assumption is correct, and correct me if I'm wrong, then I'd argue media sexyness is a bad criteria to follow and based on information pointed to above, this article should be added to the main page. Which is for clarity what I do wish and propose. Thank you."

As said above, on the talk page I had also wished to discuss the standards of how an article makes it onto the ongoing section, however @Khuft made an suggestion to post here too about it, to make an proposal out of it. Kennet Mattfolk (talk) 21:57, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My concern here is the article here does not show the frequency of updates to merit ongoing, with the last 50 edits covering 3to 4 months of events (and that's not counting which edits are significant additions). The event may be ongoing but we also expect the article to demonstrate near daily updates. Masem (t) 22:16, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is that overall activity is split over multiple subpages, including "timeline" pages. They (i.e. Myanmar, Gaza, Russia, Sudan, and possibly Maghreb as well from List of ongoing armed conflicts) should all be listed. If you include Operation 1111 then it definitely has activity to meet the requirement. - Indefensible (talk) 23:13, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm assuming you mean Operation 1111 as OP 1107 definitely hasn't had significant updates. Also can see from the timeline that that seems regularly updated, so that alleviates my concerns on the updates. The main conflict page could be written more holistically to defer details to these other parties, which would help see that. Masem (t) 23:19, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, 1111. The problem there is if you duplicate or add too much material to the main page, then it defeats the purpose of having the subpage. This is kind of a systemic design question. I would remove the "timeline" links from the box to save space, and replace them with the Myanmar link. Giving 2 links for a subject versus 0 for another is kind of imbalanced and unfair to be honest. - Indefensible (talk) 23:24, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not saying that the main page should have every detail (that's why we have Summary Style), just that I don't get a summary-style read of the main page, with a bit too much detail about individual events that are not major points in the conflict (which are fine on subpages). Masem (t) 01:06, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
1107 is down to sources/media outlets dropping the name and just blanket using Op1111. Also it is true that not all is put on the Myanmar CW main page, simply bc there were discussions of it becoming too large. As a solution we decided to pawn off many of the details to daughter articles, like 1111 1027 etc. If you also follow the news, all the sectors of the war are active and there is news reporting on it. Not all daughter articles are as actively updated as others though. Even though the Op1027 isn't as activly updated, it itself has gotten articles that are part of it, but cover an battle of it like Battle of Maungdaw, while Op1111 sorta is an all-in-one article now for most Kayah war related stuff. Probably bc Op1111 is mostly kept up to date by one guy now (me), not counting ce edits and such, but stuff adding new information. Kennet Mattfolk (talk) 01:35, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have any personal stake in this but I applaud your efforts to keep this subject covered. - Indefensible (talk) 01:40, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think it deserves to be covered, I too don't have an stake in the conflict beyond editing the article and occasionally throwing edits back to the main page. There is enough information for all other articles and fronts to be updated too, but I trust the universe that someone else will cover those. And if ever someone else wants to take over from me or fix my probably insane amount of spelling mistakes etc. I would warmly welcome it :D. I though it would've been an few month long battle and project when it started :D Kennet Mattfolk (talk) 01:47, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it definitely should be covered. Editing is a kind of stake, but without you keeping it updated maybe no one else would have. - Indefensible (talk) 01:53, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It is an stake, in the topic at least.  :)
Just to add to the discussion above on how active this civil war is;
Op1027: https://www.irrawaddy.com/opinion/analysis/uwsa-neutered-myanmars-revolutionary-driving-force-derailed-by-china.html
Karen: https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/myanmar-junta-throws-everything-at-offensive-to-recapture-asian-highway.html
Kachin: https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/myanmar-junta-counterattacks-in-waingmaw-sparking-fierce-clashes-with-kia.html
Despite Op1111 maybe being active in edits, the other fronts of the war are in many ways more hot atm. And due to that higher barrier of entry most news sites in English that cover it are usually from south east Asia. Probably bc the impact of it effects them is some way. Kennet Mattfolk (talk) 02:01, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Just to be clear, Im looking at Timeline of the Myanmar civil war (2021–present) which shows good frequency of updates and linked out of one of the main body navboxes for the conflict. Masem (t) 03:25, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
As per the reasons why discussions above and per the Masem standard he layed out as 'near daily' edits, as show there only Gaza and Ukraine fill this criteria. If this is it, then instead of adding Myanmar, imo Sudan should be removed. Imo, instead of going with x y or z wiki editors news tastes there should be an standard and if a b or c article fills it implement it for that. Also as to the conflicts themselves, the journalistic barrier of entry is higher in Myanmar, as part of Op1111, the battle over Mobye, there was an BBC article or reporting if memory serves, where they had to be smuggled into the country in order to report and also not the most comfy or secure such. Thus its also an factor, Ukraine is easier to get to, stay in Kiev and report about the front far away in relative safety and comfort. Plus the other reasons. Kennet Mattfolk (talk) 00:07, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Procedural Close - should be two seperate nominations for two different topics. This will only create confusion. 23:10, 4 September 2025 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nfitz (talkcontribs)
move to talk it is a discussion on what should be, doesn't need to be for the merits of the article or news until someting comes out of discussion,2A00:F3C:4C6C:0:C8:6A07:3902:F792 (talk) 02:17, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Technically I did state "My proposal here is to either A) Add the Myanmar Civil War article or B) Remove the Sudanese one. If one goes with the @Masem standard it should be B). (See reasons why wikilink). But for simplicities sake I'm going to propose A) Add Myanmar Civil War to the ongoing page." And I added the Myanmar civil war wiki link as article to be added in the original template. I just happen to discuss alternatives to the proposal and maybe in-case the proposal fails there is already something else to think of. :) Kennet Mattfolk (talk) 02:24, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted as blurb) RD/Blurb: Giorgio Armani

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: Giorgio Armani (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination
Blurb:  Italian fashion designer Giorgio Armani (pictured) dies at the age of 91. (Post)
News source(s): Sky News London Evening Standard
Credits:
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Italian Fashion Designer ItsShandog (talk) 13:27, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, way unsourced. Masem (t) 13:30, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
FWIW, i would support a blurb here but the quality issues seem very steep. I would recommend strengthening the influence (mostly reorganizing) so the reason why a blurb is clearly established in one section. They are there but scattered around. Masem (t) 19:35, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Masem: Currently expanding a legacy section. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 19:44, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sourcing is much better, thank you. Prose quality is still pretty shaky. I tweaked it a little myself; I'll look again in the morning. GenevieveDEon (talk) 22:25, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Conditionally Supporting Blurb Article is in rough shape right now and quality needs to be addressed. Otherwise, I support the blurbing of him per the other supports above, household name and arguably a transformative figure. Support RD Hungry403 (talk) 23:16, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

UTC)

  • Support blurb on notability; As the head of a global, household brand he’d probably be nudging towards a blurb on that alone but as the legacy section shows he was more important and influential than that. 2A00:23C8:A6D7:6E01:A080:940D:9C70:F0C8 (talk) 22:04, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support RD Looks adequate for posting. Oppose blurb While certainly a well known and prominent figure in his field, I don't think he was the Nelson Mandela of men's fashion. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:37, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    On the contrary I think he was the Mandela of the fashion industry if not the Hawking or perhaps his own person? As the legacy section shows, he essentially transformed the idea of wearing suits and was a transformative figure in terms of red carpet/celebrity fashion. He’s been called the leading figure of modern fashion and a revolutionary figure in the industry as well, something the article does establish I’d say. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 23:26, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support blurb. An iconic and transformative figure in fashion. As NYT writes about Armani, "a designer who rewrote the rules of fashion not once but twice in his lifetime,"[1], and as BBC says, "the first designer since Coco Chanel to bring about a lasting change in the way people dress."[2] Nsk92 (talk) 00:44, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Posted consensus is for a blurb. Stephen 00:58, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pull since there's no separate article for the death, which makes it not notable as an event. This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang (talk) 03:14, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Out of all the death blurbs we’ve posted this year, a solid number of them didn’t have death articles. Usually the one of the arguments about blurbing deaths is the impact these individuals had on their respective fields and if their articles establish such notability/influence. Armani’s article, at least I think, does just that. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 04:26, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    If a death is not notable enough for its own article, it's (generally) not notable enough for ITN. Old man dies, and all. Some deaths are worth posting because of their direct effect - those of serving heads of state, or assassinations. Occasionally, very occasionally, you can justify one for a private citizen or retired politician. But a fashion designer? It might be news in Italy, but certainly not globally. This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang (talk) 06:17, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    There is zero requirement for a separate death article, and it can be disruptive to keep trying to insist there such a requirement when that is not at all among the guidelines. Masem (t) 05:03, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    It's not an absolute requirement, but I would say that it's a good first-order test of whether someone is notable enough for a death blurb. As you well know, I think ITN is far too liberal with them, partially because "impact on a field" is an infinitely movable goalpost and also because of topic provincialism (no matter how revolutionary an underwater basket-weaver you were, that's just not a world-changing life story) This post was made by orbitalbuzzsaw gang (talk) 06:19, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    It's not a requirement and in many cases would be an unnecessary WP:CFORK. There are 3 situations for people meeting WP:ITNRDBLURB, and only "death as the main story" criteria would be appropriate for creating death articles. Transformative figures dying of old age don't need separate articles, however they can still meet the criteria of transformative figures- which Armani does. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:09, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    This man influenced everyday's appearance of hundreds of millions of people, re-wrote the books on formal and smart-casual dressing and exerted a major shift in the clothing industry, especially in countries with cheap labour where millions of people work for subsistence. So, it doesn't really seem that his field is provincial.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:04, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Agree with this. I know very little about fashion, but as soon as I read on BBC News that he'd died, I immediately thought that this would be a successful "death blurb" nomination, hence why I added the blurb. Joseph2302 (talk) 08:12, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There is no requirement for a separate death article. You are, bluntly, lying to the editor base every time you claim otherwise. As Joseph2302 rightly observes, it would in fact be a violation of WP:CFORK in this and many other cases in which you present this spurious claim. Please stop. GenevieveDEon (talk) 09:15, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Streameast

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: Streameast (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The world's largest pirate sports streaming service is closed by a police raid. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Streameast, an illegal sport streaming service, closes following a police raid.
News source(s): BBC, NYT
Credits:

Article updated
Nominator's comments: I was surprised to find that we didn't have an article about this and so have made a start. Andrew🐉(talk) 11:09, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • WE posted the conviction of the Pirate Bay operators. We posted both the conviction and the shutdown of Megaupload, but the latter was made more significant by Anonymous staging various attacks to protest the shutdown. Besides the unacceptable short length of this article, I'm not seeing many crying over this loss here, so it would only make sense to post if the operators are convicted in court. Masem (t) 12:08, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ETA: And the article doesn't even say what was raided, by which police, in order to shut the thing down. This is absolutely not ready for ITN. I'm not convinced it's ready for WP. GenevieveDEon (talk) 16:06, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Close This is not notable per NATG19 2606:9400:98A0:92A0:F965:A052:8324:6519 (talk) 17:44, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ben Roberts-Smith

[edit]
Proposed image
Ben Roberts-Smith speaking at the 2015 National Flag Raising and Citizenship Ceremony
Article: Ben Roberts-Smith (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The High Court of Australia rejects Ben Roberts-Smith's final bid to overturn a civil judgement which found that he had committed murder and other war crimes while deployed to Afghanistan. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ The High Court of Australia rejects Ben Roberts-Smith's final bid to overturn a civil judgement which found that he had committed war crimes.
News source(s): ABC News (Australia) The Sydney Morning Herald BBC UK AP News Ottumwa Courier Killeen Daily Herald Seattle Times Capital Brief
Credits:

Nominator's comments: The allegations of war crimes and the resulting defamation action (labbeled the trial of the century by Australian media) brought by Roberts-Smith has had international coverage. The refusal by the high court, to hear the appeal, brings Roberts-Smith's avenues for appeal to an end. TarnishedPathtalk 14:08, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 3

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Arts and culture

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections

Science and technology


Jamaica election

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: 2025 Jamaican general election (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The Jamaica Labour Party, led by incumbent prime minister Andrew Holness (pictured), wins a third term in the general election. (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian
Credits:

Article updated
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

 Rushtheeditor (talk) 00:53, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support The article is of sufficient quality for ITN. --MtPenguinMonster (talk) 04:02, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Cheng Ching-mao

[edit]
Article: Cheng Ching-mao (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): National Dong Hwa University
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Taiwanese sinologist. Article is long enough and fully sourced. QuicoleJR (talk) 22:12, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Ascensor da Glória derailment

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: Ascensor da Glória derailment (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The Ascensor da Glória (pictured), a funicular in Lisbon, Portugal, derails, killing 15 people and injuring 18 others. (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ At least 15 people are killed in a funicular derailment in Lisbon, Portugal.
News source(s): RTP
Credits:

Nominator's comments: Unusual accident in a rare catastrophic-occurrence country. ArionStar (talk) 20:57, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

September 2

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

  • At least 60 people are killed and dozens rescued after an overloaded boat carrying more than 100 passengers strikes a submerged tree stump and capsizes on the Niger River near Borgu, Niger State, Nigeria, with search operations continuing for missing persons. (Reuters)

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections


RD: Moustapha Sall

[edit]
Article: Moustapha Sall (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Rim Sport, Foot Africa
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Mauritanian football manager Sahaib (talk) 20:53, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Patrick Hemingway

[edit]
Article: Patrick Hemingway (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): McFadden, Robert D. (September 3, 2025). "Patrick Hemingway, Ernest's Devoted Second Son, Is Dead at 97". The New York Times. Retrieved September 3, 2025.
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 jlwoodwa (talk) 02:31, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) 2025 United States strike on a Southern Caribbean boat

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article: 2025 United States strike on a Southern Caribbean boat (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ The United States Navy sinks (video) a reportedly drug-carrying boat operated by the Venezuela–based gang Tren de Aragua in the Southern Caribbean, killing eleven people. (Post)
News source(s): CBS News
Credits:
 ArionStar (talk) 23:18, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose per most above and WP:NTRUMP. Nothing's happened yet and it doesn't look like anything will come of this, and it's worth noting that Venezuela denied that this happened at all. Departure– (talk) 12:51, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also, it's worth noting that it hasn't been confirmed the boat was operating for Tren de Aragua; the target article 2025 United States strike on Tren de Aragua boat is thus a non-neutral redirect to 2025 United States strike on a Southern Caribbean boat. Departure– (talk) 13:09, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This isn't the right forum for extended discussion, but: is Southern Caribbean actually a real geographic term that should be in an article title? That article was created in November 2024, there is no map, and the sources don't even use the term; being largely background about countries in the ostensible region. 217.180.228.155 (talk) 13:59, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Southern Caribbean: BBC, Reuters, France24, CNN and more. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:27, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You're kidding. I'm going to AfD that. EF5 15:56, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This entire nomination explemifies why WP is not a newspaper. We currently have zero understanding of any long term impact, and yet we are rushing to create articles before that impact can even be formed. Masem (t) 16:35, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I could spend my entire editing career cleaning up Venezuelan articles like this, and they'd still all be SYNTH, POV, BLP vios and UNDUE. There are now three useless articles on the topic. Thankfully, ITN didn't succumb. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:24, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

September 1

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Business and economy

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections


(Ready) Guyanese election

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: 2025 Guyanese general election (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: ​ President of Guyana Irfaan Ali (pictured) wins a second term in the general election. (Post)
Alternative blurb: President of Guyana Irfaan Ali is re-elected for a second term.
News source(s): Stabroek News, Caribbean Life
Credits:
Article updated
The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

 Moscow Mule (talk) 23:53, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Right. Done. Moscow Mule (talk) 01:45, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Shouldn't it be September 3, User:ArionStar, as I believe that's when the first results were released. I believe that was the date of the voting. When I look at the last version of the article on September 2, and even the first version of the article on September 3, I don't see any indication of any results, let alone who won! Nfitz (talk) 02:04, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I didn’t get your point. ArionStar (talk) 03:08, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
My point, @ArionStar, is that he won the election on September 3rd; the first day any results were released. Nfitz (talk) 14:50, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Nfitz: the news is the outcome of the election, which was announced on 3 Sept. That's the date we should go by. Modest Genius talk 16:35, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The election occurred on 1 September. ArionStar (talk) 16:44, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support once the two CN tags are addressed. It's a relatively small country, at least there's decent prose in every section rather than just tables Kowal2701 (talk) 15:30, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. The article could be better but does meet our minimum requirements. The results table is complete and there's prose on the outcome, albeit not much reaction. The recount affects only one constituency so won't change the overall outcome. Referencing seems sufficient; there's a single CN tag but it's not vital for the article and shouldn't detract from the rest. Good enough. Modest Genius talk 16:33, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support ArionStar (talk) 00:58, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Jimmy Bone

[edit]
Article: Jimmy Bone (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC News
Credits:
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Scottish footballer and manager, decently sourced article Josey Wales Parley 20:34, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: George Raveling

[edit]
Article: George Raveling (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): ESPN
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Hall of Fame college basketball coach. Needs a bit more work. Natg 19 (talk) 18:45, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Graham Greene

[edit]
Article: Graham Greene (actor) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Variety, The Canadian Press
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Canadian actor. 240F:7A:6253:1:D045:9560:1877:344C (talk) 01:10, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment Huge presence within the Canadian acting scene, especially in terms of Indigenous representation. I doubt it would be blurbable, but I am curious what other editors think on the matter. Ornithoptera (talk) 02:21, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    The article is a far cry from even being ready for RD with the number of unsourced statements including the film and television appearances. Masem (t) 03:06, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    I might attempt to source some of the statements that are currently unsourced, but it depends on my free time tonight. Otherwise, the article is in poor shape at the moment.–Abebenjoe (talk) 07:45, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support The article is adequate. Lists of works do not normally need citations as they are self-documenting. See Randy Travis for a recent example at TFA. That article's discography has no footnotes but that didn't stop it being featured on the main page. Andrew🐉(talk) 10:28, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    That a wholly different project didn't catch them doesn't mean we shouldn't. And here, we're talking where the bulk of their appearances are in minor roles and one-offs, as opposed to a leading role, where it is more difficult to confirm from the primary source, so that's even a stronger reason to make sure those are all sourced. Masem (t) 12:09, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    For crying out loud, this is the most significant Indigenous actor. It was the most famous native person of the present era. Full stop. If he doesn't warrant a recent deaths slot, what does that say about your selection criteria? Is the point of this tab to inform people of recent notable deaths or is it to showcase the best sourced articles? Because if it's the latter then you should change the title of that tab.
    Nobody but pedantic losers cares if his appearance in some low budget Canadian tv show in the nineties isn't sourced. Claiming he was in reservation dogs or the last of us or whatever is a citation in and of itself, it doesn't need a link to some third party. Anyone who is skeptical of that can just watch the bloody show. That's how citations work.
    Get the article up there. Now. 216.181.0.114 (talk) 13:40, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Any notable person can be in RD, but the article needs to be of quality to be featured on the main page, and that's what is at issue here. And unless we are documenting the specific episodes where he cameod, it's not sufficient to say "watch the primary source to verify", because no reader is expected to have to Comb through 100s of episodes to find that. Masem (t) 14:24, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    No combing is required – you just use a search engine. For example, the first TV role listed is as John Norton in Read All About It! (TV series). To verify this, one just plugs these names into a search engine like Google which immediately provides a link to the episode which one can easily view for free. This demonstrates that the article is accurate and that no fussy footnote is required. Q.E.D. Andrew🐉(talk) 16:22, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    That is above and beyond the expectation that WP:V has for reader. We want to direct them find the source without having to do additional searches for the specific location in that source. (note, this is not the same as once they know the specific source, actually locating where they can see that source, that we don't require the source to be readily available) Masem (t) 16:27, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    The name of the TV show and the name of the role are demonstrably enough to enable a reader to find and verify the fact. Citing a third-party source which doesn't show the performance is not what the reader usually wants. Few such citations are actually used by readers and so they are mostly busywork and clutter. WP:V does not require citations for uncontroversial facts and featured articles don't require them. ITN does not require FA level quality and so we're good. Andrew🐉(talk) 16:43, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Even taking that as a basis, we still require finer pointers to the direct source than saying "one episide" of a long running TV series. We don't cite a thousand page book for one fact without narrowing that (either by chapter or page). If we had actual episode numbers, maybe that might be better, but definitely not just saying "N episides"
    And for shows that have been lost to pop memory, cameo runs are clearly not uncontroversial since this allows for false additions. He was well known that I recognize a few of his appearances, but no way that the others can be easily checked in the way they are presented now. Hence why we need sources. Masem (t) 17:16, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    There was only one current comment about such roles on the talk page. An IP editor suggested that they appeared as Rosie's husband in North of 60. It was a simple matter to Google this and establish that the role had been played by another actor. What's required in such cases is fact-checking, not fiddling with footnotes. A footnote doesn't verify because there's no guarantee that it matches the article's claim. What's actually required is a critical eye and careful checking of the claims against the evidence that's out there. But little of this seems to get done at ITN. Just looking for footnotes is cargo cult or check-box behaviour – just going by superficial appearances without the underlying competence and comprehension of the content. Andrew🐉(talk) 22:02, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    We're not expecting a thorough source evaluation but that there are sources cited. I still look over to make sure none of the sources scream as unreliable (like if they used IMDB), but I'm not going to sit there and verify each one for ITN, on the basis of good faith that the sources were added to support the fact. But the absence of sources, or providing more narrower definition of a primary source (like specific episodes rather than "one episodes" in a long series) on BLP pages is a result of years of lazy approaches to most entertainers articles when BLP demands better. Masem (t) 04:02, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    So, even Masem isn't interested in actually reading such citations. They are pointless. Andrew🐉(talk) 18:04, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @216.181.0.114: Him being Indigenous/native is not relevant, from randomly searching I was able to find several examples of Indigenous/native people who were featured on recent deaths in the last few years: Ningali Lawford (2019), Fred Sasakamoose (2020), David Gulpilil (2021), Sean Wainui (2021), Jack Charles (2022), Lowitja O'Donoghue (2024), Cathy Merrick (2024), Jonathan Joss (2025), Takutai Tarsh Kemp (2025), Shane Christie (2025). Sahaib (talk) 15:37, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose an individual nomination is not the place to upend years of settled consensus on citation of the filmography. GreatCaesarsGhost 17:00, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose on quality per GCG. The Kip (contribs) 19:36, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose on quality, expect to see arguments for blurbs if and when it's in better shape. Kingsif (talk) 23:38, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The MOS:LISTOFWORKS guideline reads (emphasis added): Complete lists of works, appropriately sourced to reliable scholarship (WP:V), are encouraged ...Bagumba (talk) 07:50, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    The MOS:FILMOGRAPHY guideline reads (emphasis added) "Vital information is title, year and, for actors, role; notes are optional." It goes on to provide an example in which the entries do not have citations. Q.E.D. Andrew🐉(talk) 18:11, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    So was it a breach when a few months ago Robert Pattinson was today's featured article? Or was this fine as a TFA but if Pattinson should die any time soon (hoping this isn't the case), it would not be of appropriate quality for RD? Vladimir.copic (talk) 23:10, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Technically yes. While every link there is a blue link so the sourcing credit should be on the associated page, WP:V require pages be sourced as if standalone so they should have been included on the main bio page. Masem (t) 23:25, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Presumably the same is true then of Randy Travis from 1 Sept, Edward Drinker Cope from 28 July, Mariah Cary from 12 June, Cher from 20 May, and Ezra Pound from 23 May? Or is it just that RD is out of step with the rest of the project? Vladimir.copic (talk) 23:44, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose for now Regardless of what sort of citations are necessary for the filmography, an article w/4 failed verification tags isn’t in good enough shape to be posted. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 00:12, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    All of the failed verification tags have been fixed. Much of the filmography has been cited, but it's tedious. If anyone else is willing to help out with the filmography I think we can get this over the line. 98.170.164.88 (talk) 05:33, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    98.170.164.88 seems to be just about the only editor to have added these citations. The other editors claiming that this is important have done nothing about it, of course. Not a single entry seems to have been removed as incorrect; everything is checking out, as one would expect. You see, in the meantime, while ITN is doing its usual jobsworth act, this has been the top read article on Wikipedia for the last two days with over a million readers – more than all the ITN entries put together. There have been many eyes on this article and they would say something if there was actually a problem that needed fixing. Andrew🐉(talk) 22:03, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    There was at least one error, but it wasn't anything worth writing home about. It turns out that his one-off character on L.A. Law was actually called David Wauneka, not Dan Wauneka.
    The {{failed verification}} tags were due to reference names being mixed up. I think someone was using VisualEditor and somehow entered <ref name=":3" /> in multiple places where they meant to enter <ref name=":2" />. I don't know exactly how that works because I prefer the source editor. In the process of dealing with the reference mixups I also detected a possible case of citogenesis.
    In my opinion, the sourcing should now be good enough to post. There are a few character names I didn't cite, but that's just because the sources available are frowned upon (WordPress/IMDB/Wikia and similar), not because the names are wrong. If anyone wants me to just add those sources despite my reluctance, I'd be willing to do so. 98.170.164.88 (talk) 05:22, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: David Warburton

[edit]
Article: David Warburton (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): BBC News The Telegraph
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Former Tory MP ItsShandog (talk) 16:26, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Dhimitër Anagnosti

[edit]
Article: Dhimitër Anagnosti (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Balkanweb.com, Gazeta Tema
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Albanian film director. 240F:7A:6253:1:D10A:B35:3FF6:567 (talk) 16:10, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Joe Bugner

[edit]
Article: Joe Bugner (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Sky Sports Boxing Scene
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Former European, British, and Commonwealth heavyweight champion who Fought Muhammad Ali twice ItsShandog (talk) 12:56, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not ready. The article currently has 21 cn tags, a lot of referencing needs to be done before it can be ready. ErktheBerserker (talk) 14:28, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 31

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Arts and culture

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections


(Posted) RD: Arnoldo Kraus

[edit]
Article: Arnoldo Kraus (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): El Pais
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Just created, fully sourced. Mooonswimmer 03:32, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Tarasin landslide

[edit]
Article: 2025 Tarasin landslide (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: A landslide destroys the village of Tarasin in Sudan, killing more than 1,000 people. (Post)
News source(s): Reuters, CNN, The Guardian
Credits:

 The article doesn't look ready yet, but the scope of the disaster is significant enough to post it on ITN eventually. Trepang2 (talk) 07:12, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • I know there isn't going to be much info on this due to the location, but I have to oppose on quality per the others. Support on significance.
WFUM🔥🌪️ (talk) 15:29, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support on notability. ArionStar (talk) 16:15, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support on notability but oppose on quality as the article needs to be expanded. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 18:28, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
support as per the AFG quake (Although that one should have minimum deaths).2A00:F3C:4C6C:0:2119:EFDF:5F7B:B354 (talk) 22:37, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support on notability, oppose on quality per above V. L. Mastikosa (talk) 22:50, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Even if we go with just the confirmed 370 deaths, that's a major loss of life. The article is short but decently referenced and does meet our minimum requirements for ITN. Yes it would be nice to have more information, but that's not a big enough problem to hold up posting. Modest Genius talk 18:17, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Clearly important, but the death toll is up in the air right now. Let's wait for the dust to settle. Bremps... 13:56, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Waldemar Espinoza Soriano

[edit]
Article: Waldemar Espinoza Soriano (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Infobae
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Peruvian academic Mooonswimmer 15:24, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Charles Bierbauer

[edit]
Article: Charles Bierbauer (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): CNN
Credits:
Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Former correspondent for CNN240F:7A:6253:1:D045:9560:1877:344C (talk) 02:39, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Priya Marathe

[edit]
Article: Priya Marathe (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): NDTV
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Marathi actress article prose enough to post QalasQalas (talk) 20:31, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) 2025 Afghanistan earthquake

[edit]
Article: 2025 Afghanistan earthquake (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: A magnitude-6.0 earthquake strikes Afghanistan, killing over 620 people and injuring more than 1,500 others. (Post)
News source(s): Reuters
Credits:

 ArionStar (talk) 22:53, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Strong support. Entire villages destroyed with the death toll possibly in the hundreds. The number of casualties is already 135, including 20 fatalities. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 01:03, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It’s not a good year in Afghanistan. ArionStar (talk) 01:29, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I don’t think any year since 2000 has been good for the Middle East. EF5 01:31, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Jordan seems stable. But we added tragic blurb about Iran, Iraq, Syria, Israel and Palestine over the years.ArionStar (talk) 01:41, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Jordan has been involved in at least 3 different wars since 2000 and the 2005 Amman bombings happened in that timeframe, so even they aren’t totally stable. Anyways, that’s aside the point. EF5 02:39, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps, but Afghanistan isn't in the Middle East! Gotitbro (talk) 22:33, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose till death toll rises. I hate to invoke if it bleeds, it leads, but 20 deaths simply isn’t enough when compared to other earthquakes posted. EF5 01:22, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I see the death tlll has risen to 250, but that claim is supported by a TRT World article and given its neutrality has been questioned before I’m not comfortable supporting till a better citation is found. EF5 02:35, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
BNO News reported it. Anadolu Agency reported that the number 250 was told to them by the Information Ministry (the post). Bloxzge 025 (talk) 02:58, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Iirc Anadolu Agency is an unreliable source as it is a state-run propaganda machine, and BNO got the number from TRT. Neither are reliable. EF5 03:03, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A Pakistani official just said over 300 people died. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 03:37, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Edit: NBC News is now reporting Taliban officials confirmed the 250 number. Source. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 03:59, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support, quality looks good and it's obviously a very major earthquake in a war-torn country. Chorchapu (talk | edits) 02:39, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support: per all support arguments. An major earthquake. ROY is WAR Talk! 03:13, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support due to number of deaths. Sahaib (talk) 04:09, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support on significance, I just find the section on "techtonic setting" seemingly overweighing the rest of the information on the page, and am surprised we don't have any general articles on the history and reasonings of earthquakes in Afghanistan or other parts of the Middle East for that matter. (We have articles on individual tectonic plates but that doesn't say much there either). Not an issue for posting but just something to think about for general improvement. (There's a trend that to bolster the quality of an event article that a large background section is added. That's not really needed here as the rescue and recovery in the next few days will readily round that out). Masem (t) 04:17, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per all above, high death count Hungry403 (talk) 04:52, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Post-posting support - Similar to the June 2022 Afghanistan earthquake and the 2023 Herat earthquake (although Herat was a sequence). This seems to happen once every couple years that a random crustal shallow fault goes off in the area, produces a ~M6, and without fail kills hundreds to thousands. WFUM🔥🌪️ (talk) 05:23, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Post-posting support - Significant casualty toll, large regional impact in the affected country. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 12:02, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 30

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Arts and culture

Disasters and accidents

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections


(Posted) RD: Klaus Thunemann

[edit]
Article: Klaus Thunemann (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Hochschule für Musik Hanns Eisler Berlin
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: German bassoonist, first orchestra (NDR) as its youngest player, then also solo and chamber, then teaching, from 1978 for decades, taking new posts in Berlin and Madrid in 2008. One of the most influential bassoonists of his time. - Death known on 30 August. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:36, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD/Blurb: Assassination of Abu Obaida

[edit]
Articles: Assassination of Abu Obaida (talk · history · tag) and Abu Obaida (Hamas) (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination
Blurb:  Hamas spokesperson Abu Obaida is assassinated in Gaza, Palestine. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Targeted strikes by the Israeli Air Force killed Hamas spokesperson Abu Obaida and several civilians
News source(s): WP BBC WSJ
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Fair to update but ongoing, remember July 2024 Assassination of Ismail Haniyeh was posted. QalasQalas (talk) 11:40, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose covered by ongoing. _-_Alsor (talk) 12:20, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Alsoriano97, I know and I told you even though it was ongoing. QalasQalas (talk) 12:45, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose blurb, support RD For comparison, in terms of importance, this isn't even Hamas' Karoline Leavitt. This is Hamas' Kingsley Wilson. The article itself has stringy paragraphs, not ideal but not a showstopper for RD. Bremps... 17:08, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
strong oppose the headline reads: "Hamas spokesman Abu Obeida killed in Gaza, Israel says". wait till hamas confirms it. They do confirm losses and israel also exaggerates.2A00:F3C:4C6C:0:2119:EFDF:5F7B:B354 (talk) 22:39, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Closed) Assassination of Andriy Parubiy

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Articles: Assassination of Andriy Parubiy (talk · history · tag) and Andriy Parubiy (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
Alternative blurb: ​ former Chairman of the Ukrainian Parliament Andriy Parubiy, was assassinated in Lviv, Ukraine.
News source(s): The New York Times
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.
Nominator's comments: Now is ongoing but don't forget article is good enough of posting ITNRD. QalasQalas (talk) 10:34, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support blurb. I think some could choose that this is under this would be under the Russo-Ukrainian war (as it seems quite likely the assassin was a Russian separatist at the bare minimum) however I think this is still significant enough to get a blurb. 24.77.127.72 (talk) 11:46, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose covered by ongoing and already posted in RD. _-_Alsor (talk) 12:21, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

RD: Lee Roy Jordan

[edit]
Article: Lee Roy Jordan (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): ESPN
Credits:

Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Former NFL player, needs a little bit more work. Natg 19 (talk) 20:47, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Have worked to cleanup the article. Natg 19 (talk) 00:22, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Andriy Parubiy

[edit]
Article: Andriy Parubiy (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): The Guardian Kyiv Independent
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Former chairman/speaker of the Verkhovna Rada, the Ukrainian parliament. Article currently is being heavily updated. 5.57.243.123 (talk) 10:34, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe, blurb? Андрій ЯЧ (talk) 13:17, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No. There is no or minor impact only in the Ukraine or in the world. Editors would likely to oppose on blurb and RD will be fine. ROY is WAR Talk! 13:38, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
*Not ready. His DoB and PoB is unsourced. The article's education section is entirely unsourced. Two sentences remain unsourced in the article's career section. The article also has an orange tag. There is no mention of his political activities after his tenure as chairman of the Verkhovna Rada ended in 2019 (from 2019 until 2025). The article seems fine otherwise, just not ready yet in this state.
ErktheBerserker (talk) 15:48, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ready. The concerns I raised have been addressed.— Preceding unsigned comment added by ErktheBerserker (talkcontribs) 10:55, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Assassination of Andriy Parubiy Андрій ЯЧ (talk) 09:27, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 29

[edit]

Armed conflicts and attacks

Disasters and accidents

  • A severe weather system in Greater Poland causes heavy rainfall, thunderstorms, and strong winds, triggering the evacuation of the Bałtyk office building in Poznań due to flooding. A tornado later forms in the vicinty of Gniezno. No injuries are reported. (TVP Info)

International relations

Law and crime

Politics and elections


(Posted) RD: Robert Diouf

[edit]
Article: Robert Diouf (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Le Soleil
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

 BeanieFan11 (talk) 20:38, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Zhanna Kolodub

[edit]
Article: Zhanna Kolodub (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): vechirniy.kyiv.ua
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Ukrainian composer, pianist and academic teacher, all for 50+ years. - There was an article but it had only a few and only Ukrainian sources, and much of it was copied from ref Libby. - Sorry, that took some time. - Death known on 29 August. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:41, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) 2025 Samoan general election

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: 2025 Samoan general election (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Samoa United in Faith wins an absolute majority in the 2025 Samoan general election, while Prime Minister Fiamē Naomi Mataʻafa's Samoa Uniting Party is reduced to three seats. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Samoa United in Faith wins an absolute majority in the 2025 Samoan general election.
Alternative blurb II: Faʻatuatua i le Atua Samoa ua Tasi, led by Laʻauli Leuatea Schmidt (pictured), wins the Samoan general election.
Alternative blurb III: ​ The FAST party, led by Laʻauli Leuatea Schmidt (pictured), wins the Samoan general election.
News source(s): Samoa Observer, Tagata Pasifika
Credits:

The nominated event is listed on WP:ITN/R, so each occurrence is presumed to be important enough to post. Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article and update meet WP:ITNCRIT, not the significance.

Nominator's comments: Notable as a national election that will almost certainly result in a change in leadership. Results are provisional; could potentially post in a few days when they're finalised. PtolemyXV (talk) 20:14, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support once results are posted. I also think the article should be re-nominated once that happens. Currently, the article is in great shape for an election of which the results haven't been announced. V. L. Mastikosa (talk) 14:46, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Wait as there are 17 constituencies with razor-thin margins, some in the single digits. Some of these seats could change hands once the final count is complete, which will not be until 5 September. Although FAST is in the lead, there is still a possibility that the party may not secure an outright majority. Once the final results are in, we can post. Also, per WP:COMMONNAME, FAST is more commonly referred to by its Samoan name, Faʻatuatua i le Atua Samoa ua Tasi. It is rarely referred to as Samoa United in Faith. Cheers, N Panama 84534 🏝️🥥 02:06, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Change to withdraw, article can be renominated once the final count is complete. This nomination risks being closed for becoming stale. N Panama 84534 🏝️🥥 11:42, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) RD: Rodion Shchedrin

[edit]
Article: Rodion Shchedrin (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Gramophone
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: Leading classical composer of the Soviet Union, but then also for decades leader for new music in Russia, known for ballets such as Carmen Suite and Anna Karenina, because his wife was a ballerina of the Bolshoi Theatre, many commissions from the United States. The article was poor and tagged for multiple issues. It could still grow but at least I think that it's referenced now. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:31, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) August 2025 Indonesian protests

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: August 2025 Indonesian protests (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Protests in Indonesia occured over a housing allowance hike for parliament members and the death of a motorcycle taxi driver. (Post)
Alternative blurb: Protests in Indonesia erupt over increased benefits and salaries given to parliament members.
News source(s): New York Times, ABC, Al Jazeera
Credits:

Article updated

 Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 11:01, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Additional comment They have burned multiple Transjakarta bus shelters in Jakarta and the South Sulawesi Regional House of Representative office building in Makassar over the last 4-5 hours as I am writing this. You may add these info to the altblurb if a credible and verified english language news article write about this. SymphonyWizard72 (talk) 17:01, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
 Done It was added in two separate sections. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 17:46, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The protests are tens of thousands strong, but No Kings reached five million and wasn't posted. (And No Kings didn't create lasting change.) Barring a major escalation past what has already been seen (sustained protest, a Tiananmen-style incident, a revolution, etc.) I would oppose this appearing. Bremps... 17:15, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Citing Masem above: "we try to not to justify posting or not posting due to posting or not posting something similar", but assuming that's not a problem, I believe that No Kings is mostly spontaneous, peaceful, and had no clear goals or escalation? (Rather than trying to reach a goal, it's more of a movement to portray this guy as a "king") This one's the opposite of the No Kings protest with the chaos that ensued. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 17:20, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Bremps, I would like to point out that in my previous comment above yours directly, an entire local government office was burned. Here is a new English news source for that incident: https://voi.id/en/a/510126
If you don’t trust that, here is one from a credible local Indonesian news source, but please use a translator service to read it: https://news.detik.com/berita/d-8086836/kebakaran-gedung-dprd-makassar-1-orang-tewas-usai-terjebak-di-lantai-4/amp
This is not comparable to the No Kings protests which definitely was not as violent as this. SymphonyWizard72 (talk) 17:35, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Acknowledged, but I would like to note that political arsons are more common than suggested. This year, the New Mexico GOP's HQ was burned, an ICE office was burned, and the Pennsylvania Governor's residence was burned in the US alone. (Not to mention the national legislature arsons in Liberia and Georgia last year.) Bremps... 18:54, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to count solely by the number, in just a single day more than a dozen of official parliament residence, buildings, and police offices were torched by the mobs all across the country simultaneously. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 02:53, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I strongly suggest reading WP:NPA, WP:AGF, and striking the The standard for wikipedia editors are so low portion of your comment. EF5 19:03, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Some thoughts. These are the mainpages of the news outlets by the time I was writing this comment: CNA, Deutsche Welle, AP News, Reuters, Al Jazeera, BBC. And per Masem - defining how new outlets are counted as a international headlines are discriminative - most of them cater to a different audience (for example one of the news outlets you mentioned has a mainpage consisted of only Trump-and-Musk glazing]. And regarding impact - don't you think impacts are too early to think about? We've posted accidents here solely due to the high body count, with the government not even moving an inch to get things right in the future. Does that count as something that's not (yet to be) impactful? Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 19:10, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I agree and would like to apologize for the “low standard” comment that is very subjective. We can disagree on nomination procedure, but my comment about the standard was out of line and was made during the heat of the moment.
That said, I still stand with my statement that “not first page result = not notable” comment, as it is still covered by multiple reliable sources and still is a massive event, just like the protests in Turkey, Georgia, and Serbia earlier this year, which was also nominated. SymphonyWizard72 (talk) 05:12, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also, just as some editors below also commented, news result and therefore notability is very subjective and can be different for every person, depending on their IP location. SymphonyWizard72 (talk) 05:15, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Seriously advice Symphony here to retract/strike the WP:PERSONALATTACK. Remember Wikipedia:Comment on content, not on the contributor and in this case Jusdafax's comment was clearly made in good faith. Please be more careful in the future. Gotitbro (talk) 05:37, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
We have zero requirement for news to be on the front page, and even discourage that as a merit given how news sites will deliver different content based on geolocation and other factors. Masem (t) 19:04, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
So far the arguments from both sides are 1) Support: impactful, similar to previously posted protests, credible sources, main page worthy, talking point of almost all Indonesians 2) Oppose: no impact, previous protests with more protesters aren't posted, no mentions on headlines of international news outlets. Hope this is steelmanning. Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 19:15, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If an uninvolved admin would be so kind to give their own assesment on the current state of discussion I'd be very grateful ---- Regards, Jeromi Mikhael 19:40, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, seems to have been an edit conflict. Sorry for removing it. EF5 19:24, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, but this situation with the personal attack should be resolved. Jusdafax (talk) 19:31, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Already removed, apologies @Jusdafax SymphonyWizard72 (talk) 06:35, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A couple observations: First, removing the comment was not what I had requested. I had asked that it be struck. Removing the personal attack makes it difficult to assess what was being objected to. Second, you leave standing a bolded False Reasoning heading, implying as a fact either that I’m lying or mentally incompetent. I’d like to request you to strike that, not delete it. And lastly, your personal attack was egregious, so much so that other editors took note and also objected. Only then was your attack removed by you and your minimal apology tendered, which frankly, I find insufficient, but will accept. My advice is to walk away from the keyboard when you feel the urge to make a personal attack. You’ll be doing yourself a favor. Best wishes, Jusdafax (talk) 03:37, 31 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Posted) Paetongtarn Shinawatra removed from office

[edit]
Proposed image
Article: Paetongtarn Shinawatra (talk · history · tag)
Blurb: Prime Minister of Thailand Paetongtarn Shinawatra is removed from office by the Constitutional Court of Thailand for ethical misconduct over leaked phone calls she had with former Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen. (Post)
News source(s): Al Jazeera CNN
Credits:

Article updated

 Tofusaurus (talk) 09:36, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: She's head of government, not head of state. The king is the head of state. GenevieveDEon (talk) 09:44, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm talking about the removal/resignation of ceremonial head of state/government in general, BTW. 𝗠𝗼𝗿𝗮𝗹𝗷𝗮𝘆𝗮𝟲𝟳 (talk). 09:59, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • The court routinely dismisses politicians; it's what it's there for – to ensure that the conservative elites – the military and royalists – maintain control. Listening to the BBC bulletin just now, they described Thailand as a fake democracy. We should not take such shams at face value and mislead readers into supposing that there is true democracy and rule of law there. To really understand what's going on, see explainers such as SCMP. Andrew🐉(talk) 13:02, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Unless we have a wide agreement across RSes that Thailand is a fake democracy (eg akin to how Russia and North Korea are generally portrayed), we shouldn't be trying to take that stance as factual. The SCMP article only points out that there's a rift between the Shinawatra family and the military/royalists over how to run the country. Masem (t) 13:23, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm not the one wanting to post a credulous claim on the main page. But I've already cited a couple of sources. And there's lots more out there. I like this analysis which explains the problem and gives Thailand as a leading example, "everyone pretends to be a democracy now, even the totalitarian dictators. ... This dynamic is on display now in Thailand ... it’s the most coup-prone country in the world over the last century ... This is the modus operandi of counterfeit democracies: make changes that ensure that you can have elections without real democracy. Rig the elections if you must, or, better yet, make them meaningless. Just in case your rivals get into power, fill the courts with loyalists...". Andrew🐉(talk) 16:22, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    A random blog is not a reliable source. And while the point is taken that if you have a standard three-body government (legislature, executive, judicial) and fill 2 of those three with people behind a common cause, that can weaken the idea of democracy (much less all 3), but the democracy is still there, in constast to what Russia and N. Korea claim but where one person has full control and experts agree the elections are far from free or fair. Masem (t) 16:59, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Freedom House map as of 2023.
  Free
  Partly Free
  Not Free
  • That's not a random blog as the author is "Professor of Global Politics at University College London", is specifically familiar with Thailand and so is a subject-matter expert.
And there are others who study these things systematically such as Freedom House who rate Thailand as "Not Free", along with North Korea and Russia. (see map)
Andrew🐉(talk) 19:46, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support This is a big political change to officially remove the head of government. Worthy of posting. NewishIdeas (talk) 16:38, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support It's like an impeachment process. ArionStar (talk) 18:18, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose on article quality. Substantial article expansion to address this event is required. -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:42, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support head of government change. Scuba 01:56, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support While the removal occured in July, we did not feature it then with the formal process now over looks like a good time to feature this. Article quality appears fine to me as well. This would also have been standard ITNR head of government change back in July (stale for that now). Assertions of 'fake democracy' et. al. as such don't really stand, the monarch has no real power and while the military asserts major power as an institution, the prime minister still is still the one running the country regardless of the number of coups against them (the reason they need to be couped in the first place), this really has no bearing on the INT nom. Gotitbro (talk) 06:10, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The Prime Minister isn't running the country – there isn't one now and the court keeps dismissing any holders of this office – this is the fifth such dismissal since 2008. See How anti-democracy activism shapes Thailand’s autocracy "...drawn on Thailand as an extreme case whose historical roots of authoritarianism, consolidated anti-system elites, protracted polarisation, and extensive repression configure the unique development of authoritarian civil society". Andrew🐉(talk) 10:54, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Even if the fact that there's "powers that be" that were above the PM position, the PM is still responsible for policymaking and leading the government. So I don't think it would be fair to simply dismiss this as a "puppet change". NotKringe (talk) 11:39, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RD: Mufti Kifayatullah

[edit]
Article: Mufti Kifayatullah (talk · history · tag)
Recent deaths nomination (Post)
News source(s): Tribune
Credits:

Article updated
Recent deaths of any person, animal or organism with a Wikipedia article are always presumed to be important enough to post (see this RFC and further discussion). Comments should focus on whether the quality of the article meets WP:ITNRD.

Nominator's comments: a former member of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Assembly and senior JUI-F religious and political leader. Ainty Painty (talk) 04:13, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support, everything cited, good length Kowal2701 (talk) 09:37, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]

Nominators often include links to external websites and other references in discussions on this page. It is usually best to provide such links using the inline URL syntax [http://example.com] rather than using <ref></ref> tags, because that keeps all the relevant information in the same place as the nomination without having to jump to this section, and facilitates the archiving process.

For the times when <ref></ref> tags are being used, here are their contents:

  1. ^ "Tensions soar in Indonesia as protests over police brutality and lawmakers' allowances continue". AP News. 2025-08-29. Retrieved 2025-08-30.
  2. ^ "Prabowo Criticizes Police as Protest Death Fuels Jakarta Unrest". Bloomberg.
  3. ^ "Client Challenge". www.ft.com. Retrieved 2025-08-30.
  4. ^ Jakarta, U. S. Embassy (2025-08-29). "Demonstration Alert: U.S. Embassy Jakarta, Indonesia, August 29, 2025". U.S. Embassy & Consulates in Indonesia. Retrieved 2025-08-30.
  5. ^ "Singaporeans in Indonesia advised to avoid protests, large public gatherings". The Straits Times. 2025-08-30. ISSN 0585-3923. Retrieved 2025-08-30.
  6. ^ Ramadhanty, Dinda Aulia (2025-08-28). "BEM SI Bakal Demo Indonesia Cemas pada Awal September". Kompas (in Indonesian).
  7. ^ "BEM SI Batal Gelar Demo Besok, Ubah Aksi Jadi Awal September". Tempo (in Indonesian). 28 August 2025. Retrieved 2025-08-31.
  8. ^ PT. Satu Harapan Media | satuharapan.com. "1 September Buruh akan Demo Serempak di Seluruh Indonesia - Satu Harapan". satuharapan.com (in Indonesian). Archived from the original on 2024-12-02. Retrieved 2025-08-31.